Recent El Nino Southern Oscillation
When the Christ child comes a year late
Although the name El Niño (`little 
boy/Christ child’) actually refers to the fact that most ENSO (El Niño 
Southern Oscillation) events peak around Christmas, it also nicely 
captures a troublesome property of the phenomenon: It behaves as 
quirkily and unpredictably as a three-year-old child. Next winter’s El 
Niño can be reasonably well predicted in summer (which basically amounts
 to diagnosing a developing event), but for longer lead times 
predictability drops quickly: the `spring predictability barrier’.
The basic physics of El Niño are well 
understood (see figure): under normal (non-ENSO) conditions, the 
easterly trade winds over the Pacific push warm water to Indonesia. Near
 Peru this leads to upwelling of cold deep water. If the easterlies 
weaken, the warm water `sloshes back’ eastwards as an equatorial Kelvin 
wave. As a result, the water near coastal Peru gets warmer and heats the
 overlying atmosphere. This makes the air rise locally and the westerly 
wind anomaly over the Pacific is further amplified: a positive feedback 
(Bjerknes feedback) that eventually leads to a fully developed El Niño. 
But how does this process start?
IMAU director and oceanographer Will de 
Ruijter discovered in observational data that El Niño events tend to be 
preceded by cool anomalies in the Indian Ocean, more specifically over 
the Seychelles Dome (SD) region northeast of Madagascar. After the cool 
SD event in summer 2013 he predicted an El Niño for 2014/15. Meanwhile I
 spent the first year of my PhD on data analysis to prove that the 
relation between the SD and El Niño is indeed statistically significant.
 Observations support two ways in which the West Indian Ocean might 
influence El Niño (see figures a-d):
Figure:
 Illustration of the mechanisms by which a cool Seychelles Dome (SD) / 
SouthWest Indian Ocean in summer of year 0 supports the formation of an 
El Niño after 1.5 years (winter year 1/2).
1) The cool SD cools the overlying air, 
which then sinks. To compensate, the air over Indonesia rises (a). As 
Indonesia is warm and humid, this rising might be nonlinearly amplified 
so strongly so as to attract an (easterly) inflow over the West Pacific.
 This will lead to a greater-than-normal warm water reservoir, ready to 
be pushed over to the East Pacific (b).
2) A cool SD in summer tends to be 
followed by a stronger intraseasonal (time scales of several weeks) wind
 variability  over the West Pacific in the next winter-spring (c). This 
can trigger a first warm Kelvin wave, especially since there is a large 
warm water reservoir in the west Pacific. Now the Bjerknes feedback 
kicks in and a fully-grown El Niño develops (d).
This is a nice theory, and if it is 
correct, it may help to circumnavigate the spring predictability 
barrier. But unfortunately there was no El Niño 2014/15. Does this 
suggest that we are wrong? Not necessarily. In spring 2014, the warm 
water volume was about as large as in the period preceding the very 
strong El Niño event in 1997/98. The wind variability was high, too. So 
one could argue that the Indian Ocean has done its job, but that the 
Bjerknes feedback was not activated – i.e. the atmosphere did not 
respond to the initial East Pacific warming after the first Kelvin 
waves. At least not immediately. Instead, the warm water lingered 
through early 2015 and a fresh spell of intra-seasonal wind variability 
triggered Kelvin waves that led to one of the strongest El Niño events 
on record – the Christ child came a year late
.
Why did the Pacific give such a strong 
response in 2015 while remaining passive after a similarly strong 
forcing in 2014? We do not know – probably the whole oceanography 
community was puzzled by the failure of El Niño to develop in 2014/15. 
Maybe Qingyi Feng and Henk Dijkstra can shed some light on this 
question. They are working on detecting the stability of the El Niño 
system, using correlation-based networks.
Claudia Wieners, PhD student in the Ocean and Climate research group at IMAU, Utrecht University
http://news.imau.nl/?p=2641
 
 
Comments